![]() WHEN THE CASE FIRST STARTED THE THRESHOLD QUESTION WAS: Can a for-profit company be considered a "person exercising religion" under the law attracted a lot of attention.They also worry about the slippery slope: If a for profit can bring this claim and not have to provide the contraceptives, what about a business down the road that objected to blood transfusion? Vaccines? Meanwhile, opponents of Hobby Lobby say if the for-profit corporations prevail, the women will be forced to pay for contraceptives. Hobby Lobby says it is burdened by the law, and the government has already has offered others (churches, non-profits) either an exemption or an accommodation. Hobby Lobby says it only objects to four of the contraceptives because it believes they could lead to blocking the implantation of an egg. WHY YOU CARE: This is a battle between the religious liberty claims of employers and women's rights groups, DE VOGUE notes.It's called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and it prohibits the government from burdening a person's exercise of religion unless that burden represents the least restrictive means of advancing a compelling interest. At the center of the challenge is a federal law designed to protect religious liberty. But Hobby Lobby, an arts and crafts chain, and Conestoga Wood, a cabinet making company, says the so called contraceptive mandate forces them to either violate their faith or pay crippling fines, according to ABC's veteran Supreme Court watcher ARIANE DE VOGUE. Hobby lobby abc box full#Regulations implementing the law require most group health plans to cover a full range of contraceptives at no cost. HOBBY LOBBY EXPLAINED: Lawyers for two closely held for profit corporations are seeking an exemption from the Affordable Care Act's contraception provision. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |